Pengaruh model pembelajaran somatic, auditory, visual, intellectual terhadap kemampuan representasi matematis peserta didik

  • Puja Islami Putri 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Ahmad Fauzan
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Fitriani Dwina
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Padma Mike Putri M
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis perkembangan kemampuan representasi matematis selama penerapan model Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intellectual (SAVI) dan menguji perbedaan capaian akhir dengan pembelajaran konvensional pada materi Barisan dan Deret. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif dan eksperimen semu dengan rancangan non-equivalent posttest-only control group design. Sampel terdiri atas 72 peserta didik kelas XI Fase F SMAN 1 Koto XI Tarusan tahun ajaran 2026/2027, yaitu 36 peserta didik pada kelas eksperimen dan 36 pada kelas kontrol. Perkembangan kelas eksperimen ditelaah melalui enam kuis, sedangkan capaian akhir diukur dengan tes uraian tiga soal. Rata-rata nilai kuis meningkat dari 59,52 pada kuis pertama menjadi 80,10 pada kuis keenam. Rata-rata tes akhir kelas eksperimen adalah 70,26 (median = 72,5; SD = 23,6), sedangkan kelas kontrol 62,85 (median = 67; SD = 17,5). Uji normalitas menunjukkan data kedua kelompok tidak berdistribusi normal; karena itu digunakan uji Mann–Whitney. Hasilnya menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik dengan p = 0,042 (uji satu arah sebagaimana hipotesis penelitian). Temuan mendukung potensi SAVI dalam konteks penelitian ini, tetapi generalisasi dibatasi oleh penggunaan dua kelas pada satu sekolah dan rancangan tanpa pretest pada kelompok sampel.

Keywords
  • Representasi matematis
  • Model pembelajaran SAVI
  • Eksperimen semu (Quasi-Experiment)
  • Barisan dan deret
  • Pendidikan matematika
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Abung, F., & Andriani, S. (2020). Kemampuan representasi matematis dan disposisi berpikir kreatif berdasarkan pembelajaran SAVI (somatic, auditory, visual and intellectually). Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 81–90.
  2. Acevedo Nistal, A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: A critical review. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(5), 627–636.
  3. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198.
  4. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners' and teachers' gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286.
  5. Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954). A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 765–769.
  6. Aprilyani, S., Asma, S. N., & Novianti, M. (2024). Penerapan model pembelajaran SAVI terhadap kemampuan representasi matematis siswa. Jurnal Armada Pendidikan, 2(2), 77–86.
  7. Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241.
  8. Darozatun, D., Zakiah, N. E., & Nuraida, I. (2021). Meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematis siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran connecting, organizing, reflecting, extending (CORE). J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 2(1), 105–114.
  9. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131.
  10. Febtalinda, R., Murtafiah, W., & Gembong, S. (2025). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa SMP pada materi statistika. Seminar Nasional Sosial Sains, Pendidikan, Humaniora (SENASSDRA), 4(2), 215–222.
  11. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
  12. Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18.
  13. Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 197–218). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. Iksan, A., Wulansari, R., Roesdiana, L., & Imami. (2019). Pengaruh model Somatic Auditory Visualization Intellectually (SAVI) terhadap kemampuan representasi matematis siswa SMP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (Sesiomadika), 511–522.
  15. Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621.
  16. Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2006). Algebraic generalisation strategies: Factors influencing student strategy selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3–28.
  17. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33–40). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1–21.
  19. Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.
  20. Meier, D. (2000). The accelerated learning handbook: A creative guide to designing and delivering faster, more effective training programs. McGraw-Hill.
  21. Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  23. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
  24. Pratama, Y. A., & Mashuri. (2023). Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa kelas VII pada SAVI berbantuan video animasi. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 606–613.
  25. Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(1), 83–96.
  26. Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126.
  27. Rahlan, I., & Sofyan, D. (2021). Kemampuan representasi dan disposisi matematis siswa melalui CTL dan SAVI. PLUSMINUS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(3), 493–504.
  28. Rahmadian, N. M., Mulyono, & Isnarto. (2019). Kemampuan representasi matematis dalam model pembelajaran Somatic, Auditory, Visualization, Intellectually (SAVI). PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 287–292.
  29. Rahmah, A., Djamaan, E. Z., Fauzan, A., & Harisman, Y. (2025). Development of video-assisted mathematics learning materials using the SAVI model to enhance mathematical representation skills. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 13(1), 167–178.
  30. Rau, M. A., & Matthews, P. G. (2017). How to make 'more' better? Principles for effective use of multiple representations to enhance students' learning about fractions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(4), 531–544.
  31. Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597.
  32. Salsabila, S. E. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Somatis, Auditori, Visual, Intelektual (SAVI) Berbantuan Software Cabri 3D terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Kota Jambi. 2023.
  33. Saputra, A. W., Nasution, M. D. C., & Fauziah, E. M. (2022). Menumbuhkembangkan kemampuan representasi matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika, 2, 49–60.
  34. Setyani, A., Nizaruddin, & Utami, R. E. (2019). Efektivitas model pembelajaran Somatic, Auditory, Visual, and Intellectual (SAVI) berbantu kartu soal terhadap kemampuan representasi matematis siswa, 127–134.
  35. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
  36. Stylianou, D. A. (2010). Teachers' conceptions of representation in middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(4), 325–343.
  37. Syafitry, W., & Asmar, A. (2023). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Somatic, Auditory, Visualization, Intellectually terhadap kemampuan representasi matematis peserta didik kelas XII IPS SMA Negeri 3 Padang.
  38. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.
  39. Villegas, J. L., Castro, E., & Gutiérrez, J. (2009). Representations in problem solving: A case study with optimization problems. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(17), 279–308.
  40. Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133.

Similar Articles

<< < 31 32 33 34 35 36 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 312 times
PDF
: 26 times